Residents in Kate Steinle’s hometown are outraged that at the not guilty verdict in the trial of the man charged with killing her in San Francisco. (Dec. 1)
The parents of a woman fatally shot by an undocumented immigrant in July 2015 cannot sue San Francisco for neglecting to hold him for deportation proceedings, a U.S. appeals court ruled.
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday unanimously refused to reinstate the lawsuit that sparked national debate over sanctuary cities limiting cooperation with federal immigration officials.
Jose Ines Garcia-Zarate, a Mexican national, fatally shot Kate Steinle after being deported five times. San Francisco’s former sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi, released him from jail three months before the shooting, despite a request from Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to hold him until he could be picked him up for deportation proceedings.
On Monday, the court ruled Mirkarimi violated no federal, state or local laws by refusing to tell ICE about his release date.
The attorney representing Steinle’s family, Frank Pitre, did not immediately reply to The Associated Press’ request for comment. Steinle, 32, was shot while posing for pictures with her father on a San Francisco pier.
‘Where was sanctuary for Kate Steinle?’: Trump says he’ll make Kate Steinle’s killer a 2020 campaign issue
Describing the case as “undeniably tragic,” 9th Circuit Judge Mark Bennett said the sheriff had authority to issue a memo limiting local cooperation with immigration officials. Federal immigration laws did not require Mirkarimi to share Garcia-Zarate’s release date, he added.
“The tragic and unnecessary death of Steinle may well underscore the policy argument against Sheriff Mirkarimi’s decision to bar his employees from providing the release date of a many times convicted felon to ICE,” Bennett said. “But that policy argument can be acted upon only by California’s state and municipal political branches of government, or perhaps by Congress.”
A San Francisco jury in 2017 ruled Garcia-Zarate was not guilty of murder, but convicted him of illegal gun possession. He is pleading guilty to federal gun charges.
Part of the lawsuit against the federal government relating to the gun used in the shooting is moving forward. Steinle’s parents allege a U.S. Bureau of Land Management ranger left his .40-caliber Sig Sauer in plain sight in an unlocked car on a downtown San Francisco street. The ranger had reported it stolen from his SUV.
Contributing: The Associated Press
Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/03/26/kate-steinle-family-cant-sue-san-francisco-court-rules/3282366002/